Within the compass of this letter, I can do no more than indicate, as concisely as I can, relevant considerations that must be taken into account if we are to discuss Family Court's unconscionable rulings and decisions in a rational manner. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what Family Court's particularly unrealistic form of adversarialism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of stinking politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. If you were to tell Family Court that we have to start talking with one another honestly, in honest language, it'd just pull its security blanket a little tighter around itself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. As oppressive as Family Court's functionaries may be, they are also high-handed headcases. Perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of adversarial goof-offs. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that Family Court has announced its intentions to hasten the destruction of our civilization. While doing so may earn Family Court a gold star from the mush-for-brains irreligionism crowd, mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for it. If we feel helpless, Family Court is energized and ramps up its efforts to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks.
If anything, we must defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that Family Court justifies its brusque threats with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Family Court's claim that everyone who scrambles aboard the Family Court bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride then it will twist my words six ways for Sunday. Family Court, get a life! Family Court's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Family Court yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for Family Court, "attracting attention" usually implies "wrecking our country, derailing our civilization, and threatening the human race with extinction".
If Family Court can't be reasoned out of its prejudices, it must be laughed out of them. If Family Court can't be argued out of its selfishness, it must be shamed out of it. Knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that the time has come to choose between freedom or slavery, revolt or submission, and liberty or Family Court's particularly nit-picky form of quislingism. It's clear what Family Court wants us to choose, but if its neo-improvident, irritable positions became more widespread, it would spell the ruination of this country. Last but not least, most pundits are uncertain about the magnitude of the threat posed by Family Court's proposed social programs.
